A / BASELINE
Single-pass Agent
Generate one program, then execute it. There is no iterative tool-feedback loop.
See published results →AGENT / HARNESS
The model proposes the analysis. The harness manages tools, feedback, budgets and final artifacts. InferenceNet makes the resulting process and output inspectable.
01 / EXECUTION MODES
A / BASELINE
Generate one program, then execute it. There is no iterative tool-feedback loop.
See published results →B / AGENT LOOP
Plan, inspect data, execute trial programs and revise. Up to four trial tool calls, followed by final execution.
Read the full walkthrough ↗C / INDEPENDENT
Official DSH SDK. The published run uses technical recovery and stays separate from the baseline / DeepAgents paired comparison.
Read the run protocol ↗These are the published run settings, not universal framework limits. Unequal total budgets and differing protocols do not support an equal-cost causal claim.
02 / FEEDBACK
A research specification and its source data.
Fit the requested econometric model.
A harness can use execution feedback.
Return the coefficient, standard error and p-value.
03 / RECORDED CASE
Task 0011 asks for a monthly-clustered regression on Spain, 1905–1945. This recorded GPT-5.5 example shows why inspecting the data can change an outcome.
SINGLE-PASS
The generated program searches for common month/date column names. It misses the dataset’s tid column and exits before producing a result.
DEEPAGENTS
The agent inspects 38 columns, checks the time structure, then fits OLS with tid-clustered errors on 977 observations. Its final program recovers all three statistics.
A program writes these three numeric fields. Execution logs and the evaluation record are stored separately.
{
"coefficient": 0.27273630753072026,
"standard_error": 0.054224701707830926,
"p_value": 6.899021793750105e-7
}
Illustrative internal run from 13 September 2026, not a result in the current leaderboard. One example does not establish an average harness benefit.